Posts

when a notice is sent by registered post and is returned with postal endorsement

N Paraeswaran Unni V/S G Kannan And Another  The Supreme Court in a catena of cases has held that when a notice is sent by registered post and is returned with postal endorsement “refused” or “not available in the house” or “House Locked” or “Shop Closed” or “Addressee not in station” or “intimation served, addressee absent”, due service has to be presumed. REPORTABLE  (2017) 5 SCC 737 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 455 OF 2006 N PARAESWARAN UNNI ... APPELLANT  VERSUS G KANNAN AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS  J U D GM E N T  N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 6-10-2003 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in G. Kannan v. N. Parameswaran Unni G. Kannan v. N. Parameswaran Unni, Criminal Revision Petition No. 644 of 1995, decided on 6-10-2003 Ker whereby the High Court allowed the criminal revision of the first respondent by setting aside the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the appe
Post a Comment
Read more

The Wife in not entitled to separate alimony u/s 125 of cr.p.c. , if interim maintenance u/s 24 of HMA

Pallavi v/s Sachin | The Wife in not entitled to separate alimony u/s 125 of cr.p.c. , if interim maintenance u/s 24 of HMA Pallavi v/s Sachin     W.P. No. 6398 of 2011     Decided On, 05 January 2012     At, High Court of Madhya Pradesh     By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. MODY     For the Petitioner: A.S. Rathore, Advocate. For the Respondent: C.R. Joshi, K.P. Pandey, Advocates. Judgment N.K. Mody, J: 1. Heard. 2. Being aggrieved by the order dated 21/4/2011 passed by Family Court, Indore in case No. 345/10 whereby the application filed by the petitioner for grant of interim maintenance was allowed in part and र1,500/- per month was awarded towards maintenance of the petitioner and her daughter @ र750/- each, the present petition has been filed. 3. Short facts of the case are that respondent filed a petition under section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 with a prayer that marriage of the respondent with the petitioner which was solemnized on 16/6/2002 be declared as void. In the
1 comment
Read more